A Russian TV channel has reportedly cut a segment of the ribald U.S. cartoon comedy South Park that mocked Vladimir Putin.

http://reporter.blogs.com/.a/6a00d83451d69069e2011571ed836a970b-pi

The channel "2X2" reportedly cut material from the show that aired Tuesday, portraying Putin as a greedy and desperate leader -- a decision that prompted criticism and furious discussion on Russia blogs.

It was unclear whether the decision, involving an episode that originally aired in the United States in 2005, was made by channel executives or regulators. Channel executives could not be reached for comment Friday.

A spokesman with Russia's broadcast regulator, Rosskomnadzor, said he knew nothing of the incident.

"We have never interfered with editorial decisions," Yevgeny Strelchik said.

The channel has been threatened with closure at least twice before for broadcasting what material regulators deem extremist. The network received warnings from the government last year for "promoting immorality and violence" and again in September 2008 for "overt propaganda of homosexuality and pedophilia."

Religious groups have also sought to have the station's license revoked.

The Soviet collapse loosened the reins on news and information, and open mocking of government officials -- Kremlin or otherwise -- was popular in the 1990s. Under Putin's presidency, however, there's been a noticeable shift away from biting satire.

The channel NTV was forced to pull its satirical puppet show "Kukly" in 2002 after the Kremlin objected to the excessive lampooning of Putin.

Putin, who is now prime minister, has been instrumental in returning economic stability to Russia but critics say that his methods, which leave little room for public dissent, border on authoritarian.

Internet publications and blogs are among the last outlets for unfettered commentary and satire in Russian, and commentators on Russia's most popular blogging service, Live Journal, vented their anger after news of the South Park censorship leaked out.

"Congratulations, Vladimir Vladimirovich," wrote one blogger, referring to Putin by his name and his patryonimc. "You have become pornography."

Oleg Kuvaev, a blogger and online animated filmmaker, said on his Web site that the decision would only attract more attention to the channel.

"It's stupid to cut things this way, because the result is reverse -- a mediocre scene attracts more interest," he wrote.




A Russian TV channel has reportedly cut a segment of the ribald U.S. cartoon comedy South Park that mocked Vladimir Putin.

http://reporter.blogs.com/.a/6a00d83451d69069e2011571ed836a970b-pi

The channel "2X2" reportedly cut material from the show that aired Tuesday, portraying Putin as a greedy and desperate leader -- a decision that prompted criticism and furious discussion on Russia blogs.

It was unclear whether the decision, involving an episode that originally aired in the United States in 2005, was made by channel executives or regulators. Channel executives could not be reached for comment Friday.

A spokesman with Russia's broadcast regulator, Rosskomnadzor, said he knew nothing of the incident.

"We have never interfered with editorial decisions," Yevgeny Strelchik said.

The channel has been threatened with closure at least twice before for broadcasting what material regulators deem extremist. The network received warnings from the government last year for "promoting immorality and violence" and again in September 2008 for "overt propaganda of homosexuality and pedophilia."

Religious groups have also sought to have the station's license revoked.

The Soviet collapse loosened the reins on news and information, and open mocking of government officials -- Kremlin or otherwise -- was popular in the 1990s. Under Putin's presidency, however, there's been a noticeable shift away from biting satire.

The channel NTV was forced to pull its satirical puppet show "Kukly" in 2002 after the Kremlin objected to the excessive lampooning of Putin.

Putin, who is now prime minister, has been instrumental in returning economic stability to Russia but critics say that his methods, which leave little room for public dissent, border on authoritarian.

Internet publications and blogs are among the last outlets for unfettered commentary and satire in Russian, and commentators on Russia's most popular blogging service, Live Journal, vented their anger after news of the South Park censorship leaked out.

"Congratulations, Vladimir Vladimirovich," wrote one blogger, referring to Putin by his name and his patryonimc. "You have become pornography."

Oleg Kuvaev, a blogger and online animated filmmaker, said on his Web site that the decision would only attract more attention to the channel.

"It's stupid to cut things this way, because the result is reverse -- a mediocre scene attracts more interest," he wrote.





I know, I know: There’s something inherently gross about showing up to today’s Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince junket in New York and discussing sexual tension with Daniel Radcliffe and Emma Watson. But as the series’ sixth film rolls out next week, and the young wizard and his best friends admittedly reel from nearly a decade’s worth of hormones right there on screen… I mean, come on. What else were we supposed to talk about?

A strict Warner Bros. embargo prevents me today from telling you exactly how fantastic Half-Blood is (expect more on Movieline next week). But I don’t think it’s stepping too far out of line to note the romantic tinder box that Hogwarts has become, a home to puppy love, uncontrollable obsession and make-out spots, where teenage masters of potions, spells and other magic can’t conjure the elusive cure for raging hormones. It’s not necessarily a secret to readers of J.K. Rowling’s sixth novel, of course, but to see it brought to life — with these actors in the context of this PG-rated summer blockbuster — is more than just observing a faithful adaptation. It’s almost shockingly subversive fare for adults.

Movieline asked the principals about that disconnect in their characters’ inner lives, where a shy, awkward Harry — who’s done nothing for years but fight evil and telegraph his attraction to Ginny Weasley (Bonnie Wright) — would sooner square off against a cluster of Death Eaters than engage the cute, flirty Muggle he ditches at the beginning of the movie.

"I think it’s kind of a wonderful thing in the film,” Radcliffe said. “I find it very endearing with Harry. He’s this very acclaimed wizard, and he’s crap with women."

I think it’s kind of a wonderful thing in the film,” Radcliffe said. “I find it very endearing with Harry. He’s this very acclaimed wizard, and he’s crap with women. […] I think this film demonstrates basically two types of teenage relationships: One, which is mine and Bonnie’s [Wright, who plays Ginny Weasley], which is that kind of teenage thing where you’re just in love. And it’s pure and innocent, and it’s all that matters in your life when you’re 14 or 15 and you fall in love with somebody. That’s all there is. And the other kind, which is much more carnal and energetic. Which is the one Rupert was lucky enough to have. Those are my thoughts on the relationships in this Harry Potter film. But I think it’s quite true of most teenagers — that complete inability to control hormones or desire.”

“Particularly with Hermione,” Watson added. “She’s such a control freak. She wants to be able to control everything about her life: her destiny, her work, everything. And then suddenly she falls apart in this one. She’s just a wreck. She can’t control the way that she feels. I think in her head, if she could have chosen who to fall in love with, it certainly wouldn’t have been Ron.” Watson turned to Grint and winced. “In the nicest possible way! She would have chosen someone much more serious and much smarter and better suited to her. But you can’t help who you fall in love with. It’s out of your hands.”

potteR-half-blood_300.jpgWatson also tipped attendees off to the long-awaited smooch Hermione and Ron share in the upcoming, two-part finale, Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows. “Rupert and I felt the pressure of this kiss,” she said. “There was so much media interest. This is like 10 years’ worth of tension and hormones and chemistry and everything in one moment, and we had to ace it. So we were like, ‘Oh, God.’ But it looked really good. I’m sure you’ll critique it in a couple of years. Please be nice!”

Fair enough. Another odd exchange arose from a question about how fame complicates love — particularly for Radcliffe, who intimated how he may have inherited Harry Potter’s romantic challenges. “I don’t really feel like I’m in the world of dating,” he said. “I don’t feel like a young 20-something in that sort of… I don’t have that sort of life. I’m working. I’m happy working. It’s not the case where I don’t have time to have a girlfriend. I do. I’m like everyone else, I suppose. It’s weird, because people always ask, ‘You’re Harry Potter — does that help you get girls?’ I was 8 when I started this. I don’t know what it’s like to get girls without having been Harry Potter.”

But could he ever date a fan?

“Fortunately I don’t think that’s the case for any of us,” Radcliffe said. “I don’t think any of us are—”

"What?” Watson deadpanned. “I’m dating my stalker!"

What?” Watson deadpanned. “I’m dating my stalker!

“Well, that is usually the best way to deal with them,” Radcliffe said. “Just be up front with them.

“He’s always there when I need him. I can be very demanding. He’s so into me! It’s the way to go. I recommend it.”

Radcliffe’s eyes widened. “I’m not.”

'Freebird' ultimately unforgettable

Lynyrd Skynyrd released the song 35 years ago. Since then, it has been an anthem, a demand, an ode to personal independence and the lamest heckle in the history of rock.


Thirty-five years ago, Southern rock band Lynyrd Skynyrd -- playing next Sunday with Kid Rock at the First Midwest Bank Amphitheatre in Tinley Park -- released the single "Freebird," and in the decades since it has been an anthem, a demand, an ode to personal independence, the lamest heckle in the history of rock. But what it has never been is forgettable -- not to the band who played it, not to the disparate acts who still get a rowdy "Freebird!" shouted at them, regardless of what they play or who they are.

"The best thing about touring Europe is no one yells 'Freebird,' " said James McNew, bass player for the indie band Yo La Tengo.

And yet, Finkelman is right -- depending whom you ask, people aren't shouting "Freebird!" like they used to. Tim Rutili, the Chicago musician who once fronted Red Red Meat and now leads Califone, said he only gets "Freebird!" shouted at him "maybe once every few years."

Which is sad, because what would going to a concert be without that one person who shouts "Freebird"?

Yet, earlier this year, the world came closer to no Lynyrd Skynyrd at all -- the current touring incarnation of the 40-year-old band was on the verge of calling it quits after pianist Billy Powell died in January of heart failure at 56. (He wrote the plaintive opening melody of "Freebird.") Indeed, the legacy of "Freebird" is so long and misunderstood -- whatever meaning it once had stripped by years of drunken hollers -- it only feels right to return that dignity, before it's too late.

Besides, there's a case to be made that whatever dignity it had, Chicago may have soiled it.

Birth of 'Freebird'

In October 1977, the band -- formed in Jacksonville, Fla., and set to play seven sold-out nights at Madison Square Garden -- was traveling to Baton Rouge, La., when their plane ran out of gas and plunged into a swamp in Mississippi. Three seconds before impact Gene Odom, head of security for Skynyrd and a close friend of Ronnie Van Zant, said he remembers grabbing the sleeping singer and slapping him. "Then someone said, 'Trees,' and I got thrown by the fuselage."

Odom lost an eye, broke his back, broke his neck and lost a friend -- Van Zant died, effectively ending Lynyrd Skynyrd. "So when you tell me people yell 'Freebird' as a joke?" Odom asked. "I would say that's offensive. Knowing how hard that band worked, how much that song meant -- that's sad."

Said Artimus Pyle (also injured in the crash), former drummer for Skynyrd: "Someone yells it as a joke, I'm in that room, I'll punch them in the mouth. That's no joke. My friends died living out that song."

The origins of the song date to a 1969 rehearsal, said guitarist Gary Rossington. Guitarist Allen Collins "had the chords. He walked around playing them for hours. Ronnie was laying on the couch, then just started singing the words." But Odom remembers differently. He said the opening lines -- "If I leave here tomorrow/would you still remember me" -- came from Collins' wife. She was frustrated with the band's constant touring.

Skynyrd had become a monster on the Southern bar circuit, performing five sets every night. "Thing is, though, people didn't clap," Rossington said. " 'Freebird' was the first song we had [that] people clapped for." So they kept it in their back pockets to solicit applause, even after they graduated to stadiums. Which is how the best-known version -- from the 1976 live album "One More for the Road" -- came together. "What song is it you want to hear?" Van Zant asks the Atlanta audience and gets a roaring "Freebird!" According to music publisher BMI, that version -- 14 minutes long, with the audience shout -- has been played on rock radio more than 2 million times.

"People forget that was a meaningful song," said Tim Tuten, owner of North Side pub/music venue The Hideout. "It was about someone who wasn't going to accept what was doled out. It may sound goofy, but that was a real sentiment back then."

"Freebird" was an extension of one's values, he said. "Anyone could play for three minutes, but real music meant real long music. The heavy lifting. It was like a class thing."

Tuten would spend summers in South Carolina with cousins "embarrassed by Skynyrd -- because Skynyrd were celebratory rednecks. But music was getting wimpy in the late '70s -- Joy Division, Bauhaus. 'Freebird' was becoming a joke."

Pyle puts the transition at about 1980. For him, "Freebird" had become "this defiant thing." Which is how it played in the South -- as a sassy thumb in the eye of encroaching cosmopolitanism, and a dare to other bands to deliver "the level of excitement that Skynyrd did," said Marley Brant, author of 2002's "Freebirds: The Lynyrd Skynyrd Story."

Patterson Hood, leader of Southern rock band Drive-By Truckers -- which released a 2-CD exploration of Skynyrd's legacy, "Southern Rock Opera" -- said he grew up in a small town in Alabama in the 1970s and that song was "deadly serious, and still is. But I feel like I could write you a dissertation in defense of it as being one of the most underrated songs in rock history and I could write about its utter banality, and in both papers I would be sincere. To be truthful, it didn't even occur to me there might be irony in 'Freebird' until I moved from my small town to a city."

Old Glory, she gets around. The American flag is no stranger to movies, in fact by now it probably deserves a star on the walk of fame. Sometimes it's a backdrop for an important moment as in Patton, other times it's a rallying cry as in Flags of our Fathers. But there are movies you expect the American flag to show up; In films about patriotism, war, government, or even the occasional olympic movie like Miracle; and then there are the places where you just wouldn't think it'd be found.

So what are some of the weirdest places the Red, White, and Blue has made its presence known? Here's a quick look back at some of the mostt extremely odd cameos from the Star Spangled Banner.


Flag Burning Is Patriotic In The Rocketeer
The Rocketeer is the ultimate in the “hero poses in front of the flag” genre. In the film, Cliff Secord grabs a gun and poses hero style in front of spotlights and a waving American standard before hitting the gas and shooting into the sky. In the process he sets off a Rocketeer-powered flag burning, but it's ok since he's on his way to fight Timothy Dalton who, is in fact a Nazi and really has it coming. In the context of The Rocketeer, soaked in golden age nostalgia, it's blatant manipulation but also weirdly appropriate. Make sure you salute as flames shoot out the Rocketeer's ass.


Superman and the American flag to go together like peanut butter and jelly but in Superman IV: The Quest for Peace they took their patriotic love affair into space. There, on the moon, Superman fights Nuclear Man for the right to um… fly our moon flag on a straight flagpole. By the time it's over Old Glory is down in the dust and so is Superman who, might have won the fight had he not turned his back to worry over the Stars and Stripes. He's done in by overt patriotism!



Decepticons Hate America In Transformers 2
Michael Bay's never been a particularly subtle filmmaker, so of course when he wants to make us hate someone he goes for the something shallow and obvious. In Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen the American flag makes a bizarre and gratuitous cameo on top of a bridge, just so Starscream can land next to it and kick it over. Sure the Decepticons' real goal is to capture energy, but first they're going door to door kicking over symbols of our country, for fun.


Rocky Protects Himself With Patriotism In Rocky IV
That the American flag might show up in a movie in which Sly Stallone devotes himself to punching communism is no shocker. What's unexpected is that he takes the whole patriotism thing even further. Rocky loves the flag so much that wears it, fashioning his trunks out of the stars and stripes so that, presumably, he can keep his patriotism close to his balls. Who needs a cup when you've got the thirteen original colonies protecting your nuts from Ivan Drago's punch?


Color Coordination In Spider-Man
If The Rocketeer is the perfect example of how to do the gratuitous hero poses in front of flag shot right, then both Spider-Man and Spider-Man 3 are perfect examples of how to get it all wrong. Unlike Superman, Spidey has never really been associated with rah-rah flag waving and the film itself is hardly rooted in Americana or the us vs. the world mentality of something like Rocky IV. Yet both films feature end shots in which Spidey poses in front of the flag for no particular reason. They both come out of nowhere, as if we're supposed to stand up and put our hands over our hearts just because Spider-Man's outfit and the flag contain some of the same colors.


Old Glory Provides Fuel In Easy Rider
You wouldn't expect to see excessive patriotism in a movie about dirty, counter-culture, motorcycle-riding hippies; but Peter Fonda's character calls himself Captain America and not only wears more than his fair share of flag memorabilia, he's also painted his motorcycle up in red, white and blue. His gas tank is a motorized pledge of allegiance waiting to happen, and it's also where he stashes the cash he and Dennis Hopper plan to use in starting their new future. Alright maybe Captain America's trying to be ironic with the whole stars and stripes getup, but there's also something perfect in using the American flag not only for fuel but also to hide your ill-gotten cash. Even hippies like oil and capitalism.


America Gets A Sponsor In Idiocracy
In the future of Idiocracy, politicians have traded in their business suits for stars and stripes jumpers and the American flag has traded in its colors for sponsorships. President Camacho proudly rides through town clad entirely in flag, while on his bike waves old glory… except the stripes aren't just colors they're the names of sponsors. Later when Not Sure, the smartest man in the world takes over as president, he decks out in a flag vest and proudly shows off his patriotism, presumably by making “Ow My Balls” a national holiday. Like everything in Mike Judge's future, the flag has gotten really, really stupid.


Death By Flag In The Hills Have Eyes
The American flag is frequently used to inspire violence but it's rarely actually been used to commit it. In the 2006 version of The Hills Have Eyes though, it's used as a weapon. While under attack by mutants, one of the besieged family members grabs a small American flag and plunges it through the throat of a freak. It's a blatant and obvious political statement by the movie's French director Alexandre Aja which, probably didn't belong in a horror film. Still, at least our flag went down fighting.


The Flag's A Lifesaver In xXx
In xXx, the American flag is more than just a symbol of freedom, it's also a form of transportation. In the movie's somewhat limp-wristed finale Vin Diesel uses an American flag parachute and a grappling gun to transport him from a speeding, American muscle car onto a fast moving speedboat in the middle of the river. I guess there's supposed to be something patriotic and exciting about the symbolism there, of rebellious Xander Cage rushing off to save the world from bad guys using American muscle, but in a dumb action movie like this one it's more than unexpected.


Patriotism Enters Earth Orbit In Superman IV

Is it constitutional to fine someone $1.9 Million for sharing 24 songs? Is it copyright infringement to merely place songs in a shared folder? That and many more questions might be answered in the Jammie Thomas case where she recently said that she would be appealing.

http://www.zeropaid.com/wp-content/uploads/news/9040.jpg

The Jammie Thomas case has been going on since 2007. Back then, she was originally fined $222,000 for sharing 24 songs. It looked like it would be all over back then, but that was when a new twist in the case happened – Judge Davis threw out the case citing a manifest error in law by instructing the jury that merely making songs available via a shared point is copyright infringement. The RIAA appealed the decision to throw out the case, but the judge denied that appeal – paving the way for the re-trial. Unfortunately, right before the re-trial, it started to look like it would be very possible that she wouldn’t get legal council, but she did get new legal council before the case would continue.

Things started to look like it would go her way, but in June, she lost the re-trial and was fined $1.92 million. Serious questions were raised by many over whether or not that fine is unconstitutional as there seems to be a huge discrepancy between the fine itself and actual damage it caused. It is true that one can go to iTunes and pay $24 for the same number of songs. Many argue that the fine is grossly excessive. Not only this, but Richard Marx, an artist whose music appeared in the lawsuit, said that Jammie Thomas “got a raw deal”.

The RIAA (Recording Industry Association of America) has said that they are willing to settle the case, but there’s new details that have emerged that says that the Jammie Thomas case will continue it’s long, now close to 3 year saga. CNet is reporting that Jammie Thomas is appealing the ruling of the re-trial. There’s citation of what many legal experts have figured about the case, that the appeal is based on the argument that the fine is excessive and unconstitutional.

“She’s not interested in settling,” attorney Joe Sibley said in a brief phone interview with CNet. “She wants to take the issue up on appeal on the constitutionality of the damages. That’s one of the main arguments–that the damages are disproportionate to any actual harm.”

The RIAA seems to be trying to dump any and every bit of blame onto Thomas though.

“The defendant can, of course, exercise her legal rights,” said Jonathan Lamy, an RIAA spokesman. “But what’s increasingly clear, now more than ever, is that she is the one responsible for needlessly prolonging this case and refusing to accept any responsibility for the illegal activity that two juries decisively found her liable for. From day one, we’ve been fair and reasonable in exercising our rights and attempting to resolve this case.”

Further in the report, there was comments by Thomas’ lawyers that the RIAA did contact her to settle the case, but wouldn’t offer any dollar values. During the trial where she was originally fine $222,000, apparently the RIAA offered to settle the case for $25,000.

It’s unclear on what other grounds Thomas is appealing the case, but one thing is certain, the case will be continuing and addressing the constitutionality of the latest fine. It will be interesting to see where this goes from here.